Comparing Datasets for AI Tuning and Inference: Large Language Models vs Autonomous Driving Systems

Authored by: 

AI Tuning and Inference: Large Language Models vs Autonomous Driving Systems

At Qumulo, we’ve dedicated years to creating Scale Anywhere enterprise-wide primary storage systems and evolving them to a true Cloud Data Platform: catering to high-performance computing, supercomputing, artificial intelligence, content creation, healthcare, life sciences, defense/intelligence, and research sectors. One of the most impactful use cases for our technology has been supporting Autonomous Driving Clusters, also known as Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). These AI clusters, foundational to autonomous vehicle development, leverage Qumulo’s unique strengths in managing massive datasets with a mix of large and small files, offering unmatched durability, consistency, and scalability across public, hybrid, and private cloud environments.

While large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 have dominated the headlines for their ability to write stories, refine language, or even crack decent jokes, ADAS clusters serve a more mission-critical purpose: enhancing driver safety, optimizing fuel usage, and ultimately saving lives. Each of these computationally intensive domains—ADAS and LLMs— have nuanced differences that bring forth both challenges and opportunities. While LLMs may capture the public imagination, at Qumulo, we’re proud to empower the data systems behind many of the world’s largest ADAS clusters, a transformative application that touches everyone’s lives on the road, improving safety and efficiency.

In recent years, advancements in artificial intelligence have driven LLMs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-series, as well as ADAS. While both rely on sizable datasets for training, the nature, scale, and structure of these datasets differ significantly. Let’s examine these contrasts at a technical level, shedding light on their respective challenges and opportunities.

Purpose and Nature of Data

The fundamental difference between LLMs and ADAS datasets lies in their purpose and the type of data they ingest.

Large Language Models (LLMs):

LLMs are designed to process and generate human-like text. Their datasets consist of tokens derived from natural language sources such as books, articles, websites, and code repositories. These datasets emphasize linguistic generalization, requiring data to be diverse and representative of the language(s) the model will serve. Tokenization—a process where text is broken into subword units or words—allows for efficient representation of the data.

Autonomous Driving / Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS):

Autonomous vehicles rely on sensor data to navigate real-world environments. These datasets include raw, uncompressed outputs from cameras, LiDAR, radar, GPS, and inertial measurement units (IMUs). The goal is to train models to understand spatial environments, recognize objects, and make real-time decisions. ADAS datasets must capture not only common driving scenarios but also rare edge cases, such as adverse weather conditions or unusual pedestrian behavior.

Dataset Sizes: A Quantitative Perspective

The dataset sizes differ both in absolute terms and in how they are measured:

LLMs:

The scale of LLM datasets is typically measured in tokens. For example:

  • GPT-3 was trained on approximately 300 billion tokens, equivalent to ~570 GB of compressed data or several terabytes uncompressed (Brown et al., 2020).
  • Modern LLMs like GPT-4 likely utilize datasets exceeding 1–2 petabytes, particularly when incorporating multimodal and multilingual sources. This is equivalent to approximately one-hundred 8K RAW feature-length films.

ADAS:

ADAS datasets are measured in raw data storage due to the uncompressed nature of sensor outputs:

  • A single autonomous vehicle generates 1–10 terabytes of data daily (Waymo, 2023).
  • Fleet-wide datasets, used by companies such as Tesla and Waymo, exceed 100-500 petabytes annually. For context, Tesla’s fleet collects over 1 million miles of driving data daily (Tesla AI Day, 2021). By comparison to LLM training datasets this is approximately 25,000 8K RAW feature-length films every year, or 32 years of modern film-making.

Diversity and Structure of Data

The structure and diversity of data also highlight stark contrasts:

LLMs:

  • Highly compressed data due to tokenization and deduplication processes.
  • Prioritizes diversity across domains (e.g., scientific papers, fiction, code) to ensure generalization.
  • Significant preprocessing is performed to filter low-quality or biased text (OpenAI, 2020).

ADAS:

Data is inherently high-dimensional and spatial, including:
  • Video: High-resolution (1080p or 4K) recordings at 30–60 frames per second.
  • LiDAR: Millions of 3D points per second.

A significant portion of data is used for simulation and validation, particularly for rare edge cases.

Computational Challenges

While LLM datasets are smaller in raw storage terms, their training complexity and compute demands rival those of ADAS:

LLMs:

  • Training involves billions to trillions of parameters, requiring high-throughput processing of tokenized datasets.
  • Training GPT-3 required approximately 3640 petaflop-days of compute (Brown et al., 2020).
  • Optimized data pipelines (e.g., tokenization, batching) reduce the effective dataset size during training.

ADAS:

  • Processing involves time-series data and spatial modeling, often requiring real-time performance.
  • Simulation environments (e.g., CARLA, NVIDIA DRIVE) are used to augment training, which adds to computational complexity.
  • Specialized hardware, such as GPUs or dedicated TPUs, and large core-width single-socket CISC CPUs process large raw datasets for training and inference.

Data Longevity and Growth

LLMs:

  • Dataset size increases incrementally with model complexity. However, growth slows due to diminishing returns at scale (Kaplan et al., 2020).
  • Older datasets remain relevant, as linguistic fundamentals do not change rapidly.

ADAS:

  • Dataset growth is exponential due to:
    • Increasing fleet sizes and higher adoption rates.
    • Advances in sensor technology (higher resolution and sampling rates).
    • Expanding coverage of edge cases for robust generalization.
  • Older datasets may become obsolete as vehicle and sensor technologies evolve.

Dataset Comparisons

Aspect LLMs ADAS/Autonomous Driving
Dataset Size Terabytes to low petabytes Hundreds of petabytes
Data Type Text (tokens) Video, LiDAR, Radar, GPS, GIS, Satellite Imagery
Compression Highly compressed (tokenization) Minimal compression (raw data)
Purpose Linguistic understanding Real-time spatial decision-making - saving lives and improving transportation safety
Growth Slower scaling with diminishing returns Exponential growth (fleet, sensors)

Conclusion

The datasets used for training LLMs and ADAS systems are tailored to the unique challenges of their respective domains. While LLMs rely on highly compressed and curated, primarily textual data, ADAS systems process raw, uncompressed sensor data that is orders of magnitude larger in storage requirements. However, the computational complexity of training LLMs often rivals that of ADAS, reflecting the vast parameter space of modern language models.
As these fields continue to evolve, innovations in data processing and model architectures will remain critical to addressing their respective challenges. While ADAS systems face the logistical hurdles of scaling raw data, LLMs must navigate the balance between dataset size, quality, and diminishing returns.

Freedom of Choice

When considering the modern challenges of processing either large language models or ADAS systems, a key question arises: does my data center have the capacity—space, power, and cooling—to support the accelerated computing technologies necessary for training? Equally important is determining whether continuous training and tuning on specialized hardware is essential, or if leveraging these resources temporarily to achieve a specific result before transitioning to inference is sufficient.

This leads to a broader strategic decision: should accelerated computing infrastructure be built on-premises, or is it more efficient to utilize the scalability and capacity of public cloud environments, connecting datasets seamlessly across hybrid infrastructures? At Qumulo, we aim to empower our customers to excel in both scenarios, breaking down technological barriers so they can make the best business, engineering, and operational decisions for their unique needs. To learn more about the groundbreaking performance Qumulo has delivered in the public cloud environment using our Cloud Data Platform, check out this video.

References

Brown, T., et al. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. NeurIPS. Link

Kaplan, J., et al. (2020). Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models. OpenAI. Link

Waymo (2023). Autonomous Driving Dataset Overview. Waymo Research. Website

Tesla AI Day (2021). Tesla’s Fleet Data Collection. Tesla. Link

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify me about
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Related Posts

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Scroll to Top